I live in Washington State and I have a question that relates to what you said. When I lived in Washington State, I moved from Bellevue to Olympia. When I moved to Seattle, I moved from Olympia to Bellevue. When I moved to New York, I moved from Bellevue to Seattle.
The problem is that zip codes have multiple cities. So when you move from Bellevue to Olympia, and then from Olympia to Seattle, there’s a possibility that you will end up moving from Bellevue to New York. And if you move from Seattle to New York, then there’s a possibility that you’ll move from Seattle to Bellevue, and so on.
Zip codes with multiple cities have no meaning without a city name. So in zip coded Washington you have no idea where Bellevue is, but if you move to North Seattle, and then to Bellevue, you will end up in Bellevue. The problem is that there are a lot of people who do not know that this is a problem, and so they end up moving from Bellevue to North Seattle.
The idea that zip codes with multiple cities have a meaning is very common, but the problem is that the meaning is not always clear. For instance, zip codes with multiple cities in New York City have no meaning without a city name. So in zip coded New York you have no idea where you are, but if you move to New Jersey, and then to New York, you end up in New York.
There are lots of misconceptions about zip codes. The two I’m most familiar with are probably the first two I mentioned. First, zip codes with multiple city names aren’t a problem; they’re called “zip codes” and they are in general considered very common. Second, zip codes with multiple cities in New York City aren’t a problem because it’s clear that there is a city called New York City.
The problem is that New York City is actually in New York State, which makes it very difficult for anyone outside of New York to get to New York City. The same thing applies to zip codes with multiple cities in the same state. For example, New York City in New York State, and zip codes with multiple cities in New York State arent a problem.
You’re right. The problem is when you have a bunch of cities in a state. One state has multiple cities. A state has multiple cities. A state has multiple cities in the same state. A state has multiple cities in different states. Zip codes with multiple cities in the same state arent a problem either.
I think zip codes with multiple cities in the same state are a bit of a problem. Many times, the zip code or city has multiple cities in different states, so a state cannot be represented as a simple number (such as an int?). Plus zip codes with multiple cities in the same state arent really a problem either. They arent usually that useful for a lot of people.
Sure, that is true. There are plenty of zip codes that have multiple cities in the same state, but these zip codes usually have a lot of cities in different states. So zip codes with multiple cities in the same state arent actually that helpful.
But not so in this case. The zip codes arent really a problem because they arent zip codes at all. They are only a combination of a zip code and a state. All we are doing in zip codes with multiple cities in the same state is putting a state in a zip code.